Digital context
- Document references, revisions and defined review requirements
- Evidence submissions and recorded originator information
- Reviewer comments, exceptions and status of document review
- Timestamps and history of evidence updates
Preserve evidence while keeping field testing authoritative.
Evidence can become fragmented across different systems, revisions and teams. A linked review trail helps show what was submitted, by whom, and what remains unresolved.
A UPS maintenance work package includes inspection and test evidence supplied by qualified personnel. Select the stages below to see the type of context ECOS is being designed to organize.
Select any record square or review stage to inspect its context. Animated traces illustrate connected documentation—not physical processes.
The example notes that a UPS work package has a referenced test/inspection requirement; it does not select or perform the test.
A field-provided document or result reference can be associated with an asset without creating a claim about measurement correctness.
The planned interface shows review comments and open exceptions instead of silently converting uploaded evidence into a work permit.
ECOS is being designed to preserve context through human-reviewed work transitions. These workflow concepts are not operational status claims.
Associate the work package with relevant employer-approved review requirements.
Record provided test/inspection artifacts without inferring their technical validity.
Preserve review actions, comments and unresolved technical questions.