Skip to content
Standards & safety governance
ECOS / TECHNICAL CONTEXT

The requirements are connected.
The records should be, too.

Hazardous-energy control depends on more than a procedure or a completed checklist. Electrical assets, work boundaries, designated personnel, verification and historical evidence must be understood together.

REQUIREMENTS / EQUIPMENT / PEOPLE / EVIDENCE
Discover the control model
01 / ONE CONNECTED CONTROL MODEL

From a requirement
to a traceable record.

ECOS's intended architecture connects program governance with the electrical context behind each work activity. The digital record supports the process; it does not perform the field work.

01 / GOVERNANCE

Requirement

Identify the customer-adopted requirement, source edition and approved procedure.

02 / SYSTEM

Equipment

Associate physical assets, potential sources, work zones and documented boundaries.

03 / AUTHORITY

Responsible party

Record assigned roles, approval responsibility and personnel handover context.

04 / RECORD

Evidence

Link field-entered verification, custody, inspection and transition history.

A timestamped entry, software indicator, or reviewed document cannot independently confirm the present electrical condition of equipment. Required physical isolation, testing, grounding and work authorization remain with the appropriate personnel.
02 / WORK CONTEXT

The activity shapes
the requirements.

A facility can be operating while a particular crew performs construction. Commissioning, modifications and maintenance also involve different responsibilities. A lifecycle label alone cannot determine legal applicability.

Explore a work context
Illustrative scope guide

Construction / installation

Work on newly installed or modified electrical infrastructure can involve facility circuit controls or specialized utility T&D construction requirements. Scope, equipment and employer responsibilities need to be evaluated before procedures are selected.

OSHA 1926 Subpart KOSHA 1926 Subpart VProject / owner requirements

These examples are orientation aids, not an automated legal determination. Confirm which provisions apply with the employer's authorized safety and legal personnel.

03 / REGULATORY & INDUSTRY REFERENCES

Defined frameworks.
Clear boundaries.

These resources support program research and requirements mapping. Federal regulations, consensus standards and contract specifications have different legal standing; customer adoption and applicable editions must be verified.

Federal regulation / general industry

29 CFR 1910.147

Control of hazardous energy for covered servicing and maintenance. Includes energy-control procedures, training, periodic inspection, group LOTO and shift-transition provisions. Scope exclusions must be checked.

Federal regulation / utilization equipment

29 CFR 1910.333

Electrical safety-related work practices for covered electrical utilization work, including provisions for deenergized circuits, lockout/tagging and verification.

Federal regulation / electrical construction

29 CFR 1926.417

Construction requirements for tagging controls and deenergized equipment or circuits, including points at which the circuit could be energized.

Federal regulation / utility construction

29 CFR 1926 Subpart V

Specialized electric power transmission and distribution construction requirements, including clearances, deenergizing, grounding, and substations.

Federal regulation / power operations

29 CFR 1910.269

Requirements for covered electric power generation, transmission and distribution operations and maintenance, including employer and employee coordination duties.

Federal agency / contract-dependent

USACE EM 385-1-1

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers safety and occupational health requirements, including Chapter 12 hazardous-energy control. The 15 March 2024 manual may be contractually applicable on covered projects.

Industry consensus standard

NFPA 70E

Electrical safety-related work practices, risk assessments, and electrically safe work conditions. NFPA lists a 2027 edition; the edition applicable to a customer program may differ.

Industry consensus standard

ANSI/ASSP Z244.1

Hazardous-energy control using lockout, tagout and alternative methods. The 2024 edition revises the 2016 (R2020) edition; alternative methods require case-specific technical evaluation.

Reference summaries are not reproductions of standards, legal advice, regulatory endorsements, or assertions of ECOS certification. This page does not determine which framework governs a particular employer or job.

04 / NON-NEGOTIABLE BOUNDARY

Technology supports.
People establish safety.

The public ECOS Scenario Explorer depicts fictional equipment relationships. A colored status or linked record does not establish present voltage, physical isolation, grounding or permission to work.

01

Employer program

Applicable regulations, approved procedures, qualified personnel and training remain employer-controlled responsibilities.

02

Physical field controls

Isolation, device placement, testing, protective grounding and work boundaries are established through authorized field practices.

03

Accountable evidence

ECOS is designed to associate submitted records with the equipment, work activity and responsible person; digital records do not replace verification.

05 / ACCESS & EVALUATION

Built for the work
behind the work.

Bring electrical contractors, commissioning teams, facility owners and EHS leaders into the same conversation about responsibility and traceable evidence.

Request platform access

Product evaluation is separate from operational authorization. No live safety or compliance controls are represented as implemented on this page.